Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by Retric on Sunday June 05, 2016 @12:53PM
(#11841831)
EX: http://mls.catskill4sale.com/idx/details/homes/b253/34760/4-... 200k, 10br house ~2h from NYC depending on traffic. Basically as soon as you step past reasonable daily commutes prices really fall.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by lern_too_spel on Sunday June 05, 2016 @04:25PM
(#11842935)
It has four bedrooms, not ten. You can't reasonably fit ten bedrooms in 2912 square feet of living space.
Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by Retric on Sunday June 05, 2016 @07:47PM
(#11843775)
3,000 sq feet is 20.8 rooms at 12' by 12'. Sure larger rooms, walk in closets, or wasted hallways could eat that up. But the real issue is there are only 2 bathrooms.
Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by yompers888 on Sunday June 05, 2016 @02:26PM
(#11842311)
Would anyone really consider that a farmhouse, when it has only 0.68 acres of land?
Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by mullen on Sunday June 05, 2016 @02:52PM
(#11842441)
Because you only care about the farmhouse and not the land.
Re:Basic income plan clearly rejected by Swiss voters
by raddad on Sunday June 05, 2016 @06:56PM
(#11843586)
You can rent land to farmers. Depending on the land and location in NY, you can rent it for $20-$80 an acre.
USDA agricultural statistics service
https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/E0F5EB36-3313-3D7B-...