The closest thing I know of is Scott Alexander's Reactionary Philosophy in an Enormous, Planet-Sized Nutshell [1]. It's more of an essay/argument than an impartial overview, but (besides being a good read by one of the smartest and most interesting bloggers on earth) I think it's the most even-handed, neutral and informative thing you're likely to read about Yarvin's beliefs.
(NB - the article refers to Yarvin as "Mencius Moldbug", his nom de plume for political ranting)
[1] - http://slatestarcodex.com/2013/03/03/reactionary-philosophy-...
> "I also reserve the right to edit comments that don’t quite reach that point but are noticeably in need of rephrasing."
Wow, really? I'd consider that worse than removing comments.
Re:What Urbit is
by JeremyBanks on Friday June 03, 2016 @01:20PM
(#11831677)
Great! I love Scott Alexander's writing, so I'll definitely check this out. Thanks for the pointer.
Is there like an intermediate-level overview of Curtis's offensive beliefs, with a glossary and index? I'd be surprised if nobody's assembled one; it could make the ad hominems so much more effective.