News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @09:31AM (#11814167)
Its a replay of something called "Enclosure" in Britain in the 1700s (actually for several hundreds of years) where the commons got fenced and contracted out. It meant laborers could no longer live for a while off the land - a brace of rabbits, a partridge for the pot. So labor had to work for an employer to live, at whatever pay the employer chose. Which essentially enslaved them. Or so the argument went.
Re:Moving Forward on Basic Income by ethbro on Wednesday June 01, 2016 @02:12PM (#11816783)
I think it's an interest ebb and flow of history. The US had (and continues to have) a similar process related to grazing lands in the West (someone correct if I'm wrong).

But the broader theme of "in order to make more, we privatize this resource so that it may be exploited more efficiently" starts to become questionable in a hypothetical post-material scarcity, "we don't need more" world.