News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning by sillysaurus3 on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:12PM (#11793252)
The number of people here that are describing trolling as fun, amusing, and effective is pretty high. I wonder why this is the case? Even if so many people enjoy being an ass or ruthlessly screwing over other people, it's strange that they'd openly admit it.

One possibility is that it's a byproduct of the school system. Most of us spent years at each other's throats in a Lord of the Flies type environment, so it's natural for this behavior to transfer to the internet.

Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning by maxerickson on Saturday May 28, 2016 @05:06PM (#11793516)
They don't necessarily mean that it is fun to be an ass.

I think it's probably a fine line, but there are "trollish" comments that can be made that aren't even disingenuous, never mind nasty or negative.

The so called old school trolling wasn't about disruptive behavior, it was about getting people to consider thoughts that they aren't necessarily comfortable with. And not necessarily uncomfortable in a dark or disturbing way.

Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning by golemotron on Saturday May 28, 2016 @07:45PM (#11794093)
Trolling is a good way to induce the sort of cognitive dissonance that changes minds. Jonathan Swift's 'A Modest Proposal' is an exemplar of this.
Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning by theoapps on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:43PM (#11793388)
It's one of the foundations of our western civilization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socratic_method
Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning by conceit on Monday May 30, 2016 @05:25PM (#11803293)
> Most of us spent years at each other's throats in a Lord of the Flies type environment, so it's natural for this behavior to transfer to the internet.

You are shifting the perspective here. Trolling in your sense, as a weak and vile but effective antisocial interaction would be significantly characterized by lacking better traits. Either it's institutional or school can't help with it. This is one of the things school tries to control for, so, if they can't control it, then because it's not from within their institution. Either way you can't just say that without any argument. I don't accept the irony that is mentioning the mandatory literature as an argument.

Since that topic is controversial and the tone mocking, I consider it flame bait. Did you enjoy writing this?