News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

conceit

What's got energy expenditure to do with logic? Isn't what you talk about Bayesian Inference?

> while one scrambles up a nearby tree

I'm not sure that is just a nervous reflex or the result of the logic implication "If that's a Tiger and I stay then I will die". Even if the thought becomes hardwired, it would have to have been logically evaluated before it became subconscious. To react and be afraid, the danger must be recognized and categorized, "If the grass twitches then something moved it", etc. etc. Going down that argument, small life forms would be able of some small amount of logic reasoning, too. As long as those grow bulks of neurons, I don't see why that should be wrong.

> just look at your first sentence

What are you trying to say?

People have an OK grasp of formal logic, that is the formalism. It's learned at an early age, it's prerequisite for deductive (or inductive?) learning actually. Most might lack the cognitive ability to exercise those formalism in an abstract synthesis into long formulas.
> to arrive at their preferred judgment first

> then ... to justify their rulings

Well, unless justification and judgment aren't pretty much synonym, that's a contradiction? The subconscious decision met by such a judge should be guided by an organic sound understanding of justice. The verbalization of this kind of emotion should only bring up the true reasons of thought, maybe polished and cut short. At least, that would be my lame excuse.

Re:Why Continuing to Work Is Good for a Man’s Health on Friday July 01, 2016 @03:46PM (#12019133)
the emergency line is the stressor I ment.
Re:Lossless compression with Brotli on Friday July 01, 2016 @03:39PM (#12019081)
I don't even get it and so may the downvoters
Re:Why Continuing to Work Is Good for a Man’s Health on Thursday June 30, 2016 @10:55PM (#12013610)
apparently, for some, many even, this puts them under some stress and pressure, socially and organisatoric.
Re:Airbnb's impact on cities on Monday June 27, 2016 @03:01AM (#11984574)
Extrapolated from their numbers, in 2045 it will be an unbelievable 16 billion, 2 bookings a night per human. All that vacationing will lead to vacation fornication and generate the increase in population needed to sustain the growth. What a keen business model.
Re:A Third of Valve Is Now Working on VR on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @11:19PM (#11958653)
That's probably why they have John Carmack on board. Half Life was a mod to his Quake 2. They had a friendly, cooperative relation so far, so I wouldn't worry.
Re:A Third of Valve Is Now Working on VR on Wednesday June 22, 2016 @11:15PM (#11958641)
> There's only one App store on iOS vs Android.

maybe I misunderstand but Adroid is targeted by many app shops.

Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Tuesday June 21, 2016 @12:37PM (#11947019)
Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:18PM (#11941660)
It reminds me all too much of genetic programming, but I know the latter almost only by name.
Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:16PM (#11941652)
On a datacenter the size of the middle of nowhere.
Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:14PM (#11941633)
> imagine trying to reverse engineer a modern CPU vs merely designing one

I can't really imagine the latter to begin with.

Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:10PM (#11941612)
> why not the converse

In that regard, the term superhuman-AI is used.

Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:08PM (#11941595)
Capitalism is rather a human worth maximizer. It's not a money maximizer.
Re:What’s Next for Artificial Intelligence on Monday June 20, 2016 @05:03PM (#11941559)
In terms of hormonal emotions, which would be the most direct sense of value that we have is completely different. Love might feedback into aggression, but they are very different.

This is view is also very naive but it's the breakdown of the "good" and "bad" discussion. Nobody commits war crimes for their intrinsic value. This is akin to the saying, nobody likes to think they're the bad guys. Even, there are no bad values since the absence of value is the worst.

Naivety is not necessarily wrong, it's just the lack of detail which often leads to the wrong results.

Many do. Foundations of mathematics is a specialized but deeply philosophical topic. Many would be interested orthogonal to maths, too.
Re:With React Native it’s not all sugar and spice on Thursday June 16, 2016 @03:39AM (#11914621)
> When you develop a fully native app you do it pretty much in one place. On iOS you’re in Xcode, for Android you’re in Android Studio. With React Native you have a terminal (with a couple of panes), a text editor, perhaps Redux Remote DevTools plus your IDE for the platform you’re targeting.

It's not like those IDEs can't be configured to work with the raw tools.

Re:With React Native it’s not all sugar and spice on Thursday June 16, 2016 @03:38AM (#11914614)
It's supposed to be distracting, but moodlifting, seeing the post exposes essentially negative oppoinions. Of course they are devoid of content.
Re:How bad is the Windows command line really? on Sunday June 12, 2016 @12:22PM (#11888804)
If I could downvote you, I would. That's probably why I'm not allowed to. :)
Re:Planning Algorithms – Motion Planning on Thursday June 09, 2016 @11:26AM (#11870017)
I'm currently in a project to build a line track driving car with a bit of image processing, physics and control theory. It'll be written in C++ and openCV. This link is highly of interest to me.
Re:Dyatlov Pass Incident on Saturday June 04, 2016 @04:56AM (#11835581)
> I'm a physics graduate, an amateur astrophotgrapher, a pilot with an expired license, and I can identify aircraft, satellites, and so-forth - but some stuff I can't explain.

You are not a UFO-expert so your appeal to authority is out of place.

Re:I created Godwin's Law in 1990 as a warning on Monday May 30, 2016 @05:25PM (#11803293)
> Most of us spent years at each other's throats in a Lord of the Flies type environment, so it's natural for this behavior to transfer to the internet.

You are shifting the perspective here. Trolling in your sense, as a weak and vile but effective antisocial interaction would be significantly characterized by lacking better traits. Either it's institutional or school can't help with it. This is one of the things school tries to control for, so, if they can't control it, then because it's not from within their institution. Either way you can't just say that without any argument. I don't accept the irony that is mentioning the mandatory literature as an argument.

Since that topic is controversial and the tone mocking, I consider it flame bait. Did you enjoy writing this?

Re:Affiliate links on Reddit on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:54PM (#11793449)
Coercion is not necessarily criminal. Where does it say otherwise?

> Should I stoop to the level of a common racist by FORCING him/her to speak a certain way?

You are not a Forum. On the other hand, your comment implies you try to convince someone to act (not) a certain way. The difference between the force and conviction might make all the difference, but conviction is one kind of force, isn't it?

Re:Affiliate links on Reddit on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:36PM (#11793352)
Of course there is. Food grows on trees. You pick it and eat. It runs around. Kill it and grill it.
Re:Affiliate links on Reddit on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:28PM (#11793329)
> Why shove non-trivial amounts of engineering effort into it

because it's more fun

Re:Affiliate links on Reddit on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:23PM (#11793313)
> theirs

*there's

Re:Writing an OS in Rust: Catching CPU Exceptions on Saturday May 28, 2016 @04:09PM (#11793221)
Every other project comes up with its own wrapper for bit wise operations. Its not that big a piece of code to find and understand. Its a matter of taste. The first one is the canonical form (in C) and the only error source is the hex.
Which doesn't help much if pay-per-view journals are still cited.

Older »