> I found it utterly unconvincing: a last-ditch moral appeal from someone with absolutely no moral credibility.

Meh, didn't really seem like that to me. I mean if what they wrote is 100% true I still wouldn't expect Peter to "debate" them. It's just another news piece targeted at one of their enemies. I don't think it's much more than that.

I do get the impression that they're going to drag Peter into their court cases. That should be...interesting.