News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by falcolas on Thursday May 26, 2016 @01:24PM (#11779786)
When you only have to brake in 1% of the use cases, and the "Autopilot" handles the other 99%, is it really that crazy that a driver does not instinctively recognize that 1%?

Or is it crazy to expect a user to be able to react instantly to the 1% use case?

Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by jsight on Thursday June 09, 2016 @12:21PM (#11870384)
It isn't a matter of recognizing the 1%. You should be braking for yourself 100% of the time. If you occasionally fail to do so, the car will manage to save you 99% of the time.

It is crazy to see a situation in which you should brake and to intentionally choose not to with a non-autonomous car.

Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by ricardobeat on Thursday May 26, 2016 @04:56PM (#11781531)
This is not very different from any normal car with cruise control.
Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by falcolas on Thursday May 26, 2016 @07:52PM (#11782716)
A normal car with normal cruise control does not keep itself in a lane. Nor does it adjust for the speed of other cars. All it does is make your speed a constant; you still have to steer and initiate any and all braking or overtaking maneuvers.
Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by ricardobeat on Friday May 27, 2016 @10:49AM (#11786383)
Some do adjust speed. The point being, neither is a fully automated auto-pilot - the human behind the wheel is always responsible for stopping the vehicle or steering away from obstacles in an emergency.
Re:Tesla Model S adaptive cruise control crashes into van by Florin_Andrei on Thursday May 26, 2016 @07:20PM (#11782508)
Perceptually it's very different. And it's perception that matters a whole lot here, unfortunately.