History lives on when you're riding the internet:

https://web.archive.org/web/20010203210800/http://www.fucked...

Fuckedcompany founder here.

:)

I wasted about 10 years of my life on fc related forums. They were great to begin with, and then gradually just became utterly terrible.

You want me to thank you again? :-)

I just came here to say that. FuckedCompany was hilarious back during the first .com crash.

>>Previously started Fandalism, TinyLetter, AdBrite, Fuckedcompany.com

I lived through that era compared to then things might be tight but people are actually making money back then nobody was making money and web applications required teams of c/c++ people the burn rates were staggering.

Web apps did not require c/c++. Plenty of ASP, and Perl/CGI sites in those days. The burn rates were insane but it didn't have a lot to do with the developer resources required. For one thing there was no AWS so many web companies built their own data center an exhorbitant capital and operational expense.

I think the difference is public vs private money. If we are in a bubble (which I'm not sure of but let's assume yes for the sake of argument) the investors that stand to loose their capital are all "qualified investors." There are few public companies that are "frothy" this time. Personally, I think the fact that the public markets appear to still be functioning well is _why_ few startups are going for IPOs.

Of course, if startups do start to IPO and the public markets catch the over-valuation bug, then we could see a repeat of 2000. Barring that, I think a correction would not infect the markets at large and may drive more capital into the public companies that are not over valued.