News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bottled water 'is immoral' by wmf on Sunday February 17, 2008 @02:30PM (#117706)
It's not clear to me that conspicuous conservation has that much to do with morality.
Re:Bottled water 'is immoral' by gruseom on Sunday February 17, 2008 @02:57PM (#117716)
Exactly. I think it has to do with identity: "I'm the kind of person who..." We seek ways to distinguish ourselves from other people because differences produce meaning, or at least a feeling of it. Constructing an identity to fortify one's ego is an intrinsically selfish activity (I mean "self-ish" literally, i.e. concerning self), which may be why the morality-based identities seem more often to be hypocritical.

By the way, "conspicuous conservation" is a great term! I hadn't heard that.

Re:Bottled water 'is immoral' by jraines on Sunday February 17, 2008 @03:28PM (#117731)
Which "brand" of self-identity is fashionable and acceptable matters, though. I'd rather be part of a society where "I"m the kind of person who conserves and thinks about morality" is fashionable than one where the dominant self-identity is, say, "I'm the kind of person who'd rather kill and die than take disrespect from anyone."
Re:Bottled water 'is immoral' by wmf on Sunday February 17, 2008 @05:52PM (#117793)
I just made up "conspicuous conservation" on the spot, although I doubt I'm the first to do so. In this case it seems almost obvious.