News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is ‘grit’ overrated in explaining student success? by kittyfoofoo on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @09:30AM (#11769585)
For what it's worth, In the Marshmallow Test book, the author mentions that prior to the test, the experimenter spent 15 minutes interacting with the child to build trust. They gave the child a bell, and the researcher would explain that if the researcher left the room, the child could ding the bell to bring the researcher back. They'd do a few iterations of this, with the researcher promptly rushing back each time, in order to build trust.

Perhaps not a complete solution, but the problem was at least addressed.

Re:Is ‘grit’ overrated in explaining student success? by LionessLover on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @09:42AM (#11769672)
It seems to me that a one-time positive experience with one person hardly influences attitudes formed over a far longer period - and I don't even need to take into account yet that for evolutionary reasons negative signals have a much stronger influence than positive ones. So to me all this shows is that they were aware of the problem - I don't see that this shows that they did anything significant to address it.
Re:Is ‘grit’ overrated in explaining student success? by Joof on Wednesday May 25, 2016 @11:20AM (#11770396)
How much can you retrain someone's brain in 15 minutes? That child's experiences are not wiped out.