News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Universal.css. Parent comment

Re:Universal.css by akavi on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:09AM (#11753929)
Is that still true? I recently joined a company whose primary audience is education, and our numbers say that less than 1% of our customers use browsers that don't support flexbox.

Are public middle schools farther along the tech curve than "enterprise"?

(Legitimately curious. It'd be pretty funny if so.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by kemayo on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:26AM (#11754030)
The sticking point for enterprise-y things remains IE, since it only supports flexbox (buggily) as of IE11.

Though there's polyfills like flexibility out there, of course.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by jbrantly on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:51AM (#11754202)
According to this[0], IE10.

0. http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by kemayo on Monday May 23, 2016 @11:29AM (#11754468)
Sort of? I mean, note that table skips IE10 entirely.

As I understand it, IE10 implements a different, somewhat incompatible version of the flexbox spec. You can see all the changes they made for 11 here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/dn265027(v=vs.85).aspx

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by cel1ne on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @03:36AM (#11759609)
Didn't MS announce to only keep supporting the latest IE/Edge version? This should help in that class.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by robin_reala on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:24AM (#11754017)
For what it’s worth my project is about 2.5% no flexbox, which is too high to move over really.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Universal.css by platz on Monday May 23, 2016 @10:27AM (#11754037)
Yes, schools use chromebooks
[ Parent | on HN ]