News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by pdkl95 on Monday May 23, 2016 @09:10AM (#11753591)
> dangerous and unnecessary "experiment"

We always hear about how they were running the reactor in a dangerous mode to run the experiment, but the nature of that experiment is rarely mentioned. The experiment itself is the craziest part!

The experiment was a test of a new cooling system feature. The RBMK's suicidally stupid design had a positive void coefficient of reactivity[1]. Coolant voids increased reactor activity. The operators new this; they had backup diesel pumps that would take over from the electric pumps if power wasn't available. They also knew that it would take some time[2] for the backup pumps to reach full speed, which was not fast enough.

So someone had the "clever" idea to modify the electric pumps so they would continue to spin freely when they lost power, so their remaining kinetic energy could continue pumping coolant at a rapidly falling rate. The hope was that there would be sufficient kinetic energy to keep the reactors from voiding. The experiment was basically a bad hack to work around several serious design problems.

The experiment shouldn't have existed. Everything about the coolant situation should have been a reason to decommission the reactor. The experiment itself is evidence that someone knew about the positive void coefficient problem, or they wouldn't have tried such a crazy workaround. Yes, a lot of the staff was poorly trained, but someone knowledgeable about reactors decided they couldn't afford even a few seconds[2] without coolant.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Void_coefficient

[2] like 50 seconds? if I remember correctly?

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by yaakov34 on Monday May 23, 2016 @09:53AM (#11753824)
> had a positive void coefficient of reactivity

Had and still does. There are 11 RBMK blocks still operating.

Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by Aelinsaar on Monday May 23, 2016 @09:48AM (#11753798)
A positive void coefficient doesn't have to be suicidal or stupid, it just was in that design. See: CANDU
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by witty_username on Monday May 23, 2016 @11:47AM (#11754601)
CANDU has a very small positive void coefficient.
Re:Small Modular Nuclear Reactors Overcome Existing Barriers... by Aelinsaar on Tuesday May 24, 2016 @09:23AM (#11761296)
I didn't say anything about a large void coefficient, and I pointed to CANDU as an example of a reasonable beta, responsibly managed.