Re:Theranos Voids Two Years of Edison Blood-Test Results
by rcarrigan87 on Wednesday May 18, 2016 @09:52PM
(#11727392)
They could have just failed. Never produced a technology. Wasted a bunch of money and all would be fine. But messing up medical tests while you are "figuring it out" is unacceptable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Theranos Voids Two Years of Edison Blood-Test Results
by vonklaus on Wednesday May 18, 2016 @10:13PM
(#11727474)
That is fair. It stings the most because the medical industry is known for it's transparency and rigorous testig standards. The FDA, famous champion of public health, was able to successfully stop 23&me (information terrorists) from providing harmful information to their patients as well. It makes sense tha Theranos should be singled out and villified for the failure of one of their beta devices that was i active development. Obviously, lieing about it wasn't super cool, but again their product "figures out and produces medical tests" so messing up your product(or procedures involving it) is === messing up medical testing.
Re:Theranos Voids Two Years of Edison Blood-Test Results
by Daneel_ on Thursday May 19, 2016 @12:23AM
(#11727942)
I would have said the opposite - that the healthcare industry is known for its lack of transparency, with big pharma being notorious for their obfuscation.
Re:Theranos Voids Two Years of Edison Blood-Test Results
by vonklaus on Thursday May 19, 2016 @12:31AM
(#11727977)
i was being sarcastic. either way, given the threads discourse, moonshots seem to be a super unpopular idea except when google does it...
Re:Theranos Voids Two Years of Edison Blood-Test Results
by davidhowlett on Thursday May 19, 2016 @06:30AM
(#11729172)
I also thought that you were being serious. There is a good reason people use explicit markers for sarcasm like: <sarcasm> </sarcasm>
I encourage you to look up Poe's law