News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by eanzenberg on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:07PM (#11717914)
I believe the stronger reason is your presidential election vote won't matter in most states where the contest is already decided. So a candidate winning 70-30 vs. 60-40 doesn't make a difference.
Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by manachar on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:09PM (#11717940)
Voter turnout is higher in our presidential elections when a person's vote is generally worth less.

People SHOULD be voting at the local level where their votes still matter quite a bit, but generally don't through an interesting combination of apathy and ignorance (e.g. few people actually know who their rep on the city council is and what their basic platform is).

Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by slavik81 on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:22PM (#11718054)
Unfortunately, limited information is an inherent consequence of scale. There's much better media coverage of national issues. If I read The Economist, they may provide insight into the presidential candidates. They do not have news about my candidates for city council.
Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by manachar on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:28PM (#11718103)
Which is really odd to think about. Super local newspapers used to be the norm, but as the conglomerates got bigger the number of papers fell so they no longer had the space to cover the truly local news.

A variety of web sites have tried to fill the need, but the money needed for local news far exceeds the revenue they're able to generate.

Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by dragonwriter on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @08:37PM (#11718837)
Theres much more media coverage of national issues, but better may not be a warranted conclusion.
Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by hackuser on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:25PM (#11718075)
> I believe the stronger reason is your presidential election vote won't matter in most states where the contest is already decided. So a candidate winning 70-30 vs. 60-40 doesn't make a difference.

Your vote, win or lose, also communicates very important messages:

1) 'I vote, and people in my community vote'. If you don't vote then why the hell should the politician care what you want? Does McDonalds care about the opinions of people who don't eat fast food? You think they should put more healthy options on their menu? 'So what? Who are you? Stop wasting my time.' The same goes for your community: If your community doesn't vote, then why would anyone address its concerns? In a world of 50% turnout, imagine the attention a community would get if 95% voted - on every issue, they'd be wondering, 'what does neighborhood X think? how does it affect them?'

2) It expresses a political outlook. A politician who sees their constituents vote 80-20 for Clinton over Trump is going to behave much differently than one who sees a 55-45 vote.

Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by nitrogen on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:54PM (#11718281)
There are much better ways we could design systems for expressing these preferences than the relative proportions of a losing vote.
Re:Vote.org is a non-profit that wants to get the U.S. to 10... by hackuser on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @07:00PM (#11718322)
I agree, but this is all we have to work with in 2016 ...