Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by ericd on Saturday May 14, 2016 @04:31PM
(#11697907)
Is the cost difference between the launches usually less than the cost of building a backup satellite?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by ncallaway on Saturday May 14, 2016 @05:04PM
(#11698032)
Yes. Many times yes. The cost of launches is on the order of a few hundred million.
Military satellites often cost a few billion. Losing a satellite is, by far, the biggest risk during a launch. The launch cost itself is non-trivial, but a small fraction of the overall mission cost.
Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by pravda on Saturday May 14, 2016 @10:36PM
(#11699112)
> Military satellites often cost a few billion.
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say the plans for a military satellite cost a few billion?
I would assume stamping out a new copy when you have the plans costs just a few tens of millions.
I mean, if you wanted one Airbus A380, it would cost you 15 billion dollars. But once you have the plans, you can stamp out additional copies for 100 million or so.
Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by gaius on Sunday May 15, 2016 @03:34PM
(#11702363)
Each one is unique, because they are always being improved.
Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by forgotpwtomain on Sunday May 15, 2016 @03:29AM
(#11699899)
> Military satellites often cost a few billion
This needs a reference.
Re:How Elon Musk exposed billions in questionable Pentagon s...
by mnl on Monday May 16, 2016 @07:39AM
(#11705651)
Not really, but here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennan
And no, you can't make cheap primary mirrors (in a garage).