News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a Glance. Parent comment

Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ... by yohoho22 on Friday May 13, 2016 @12:54AM (#11688717)
> No diacritics

An understandably naïve view of things whose errancy could easily be corrected through your coöperative perusal of The New Yorker.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ... by vacri on Friday May 13, 2016 @09:28AM (#11690271)
To be fair, the original question was how to recognise English text, not how to recognise the archaic microcosm of English text that resides between the covers of The New Yorker.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ... by eru on Friday May 13, 2016 @07:59AM (#11689859)
Wouldn't it be cöoperative?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ... by tremon on Friday May 13, 2016 @08:26AM (#11689968)
It wouldn't be. The goal is to separate the second o from the first, not to separate the o from the c:

The diaeresis indicates that a vowel should be pronounced apart from the letter that precedes it [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaeresis_%28diacritic%29#Diae...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ... by eru on Saturday May 14, 2016 @02:43AM (#11694808)
Oh, true. Naive should have tipped me off.
[ Parent | on HN ]