Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by aylons on Thursday May 12, 2016 @07:41PM
(#11687598)
No diacritics, and generous use of apostrophes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by yohoho22 on Friday May 13, 2016 @12:54AM
(#11688717)
> No diacritics
An understandably naïve view of things whose errancy could easily be corrected through your coöperative perusal of The New Yorker.
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by vacri on Friday May 13, 2016 @09:28AM
(#11690271)
To be fair, the original question was how to recognise English text, not how to recognise the archaic microcosm of English text that resides between the covers of The New Yorker.
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by eru on Friday May 13, 2016 @07:59AM
(#11689859)
Wouldn't it be cöoperative?
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by tremon on Friday May 13, 2016 @08:26AM
(#11689968)
It wouldn't be. The goal is to separate the second o from the first, not to separate the o from the c:
The diaeresis indicates that a vowel should be pronounced apart from the letter that precedes it [1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaeresis_%28diacritic%29#Diae...
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by eru on Saturday May 14, 2016 @02:43AM
(#11694808)
Oh, true. Naive should have tipped me off.
Re:Identify Any Language Written in the Roman Alphabet at a ...
by dalke on Friday May 13, 2016 @07:09AM
(#11689693)
That guideline would likely classify Xhosa as English. See https://xh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iphepha_Elingundoqo , which has no diacritics and three apostrophes.