News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Introducing unlimited private repositories. Parent comment

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by CameronBanga on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @10:55AM (#11675862)
I hope that any team using github to share passwords is driven to move away from that method because of this price change. That's a bad bad idea.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by brianwawok on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @11:14AM (#11676060)
Why? If it is Encrypted in ansible vault or something it's not a terrible way to keep your creds.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by frostymarvelous on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @11:44AM (#11676316)
I think that wasn't clear initially. But granted, valid point.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by morgante on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @01:58PM (#11677626)
If they're encrypted, you can put them in a public repo.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by brianwawok on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @08:44PM (#11680544)
Call it overkill, but I would see no reason not to go both private repo + encrypted creds.

Is ansible vault encryption brute force proof? I have no idea. I could spend an hour and figure out. But why not just follow decent engineering principles and double lock my door?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by frostymarvelous on Friday May 13, 2016 @01:37AM (#11688827)
What's wrong with using Dropbox or something like that?
[ Parent | on HN ]