News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by beberlei on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @07:47AM (#11674355)
yes, but you are comparing apples to oranges. If you had to jump from 125 to 300 users in ONE step as per the current pricing model instead of paying only for the marginal next user.

Recognizing the repository steps are a pain for customers and not moving towards a pricing per _single_ repository, say between 1$ or 2$ per private repository - is just plain misleading. They could have still thrown in the personal plan with a large number of private repositories and fewer collaborators.

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by dommer on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @11:20AM (#11676102)
I'm not directly comparing, only highlighting the step issue.

To me, give a per user or private repo cost. Allow the customer to choose between user or repo model, each addition costs a single fixed unit. Simple!