News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by Xylakant on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @06:55AM (#11674144)
> Even with that I don't think this move is disingenuous.

I never said that I consider the move disingenuous. Almost no change will unilaterally benefit everybody. I dislike the communication that reads as if the change is unilaterally beneficial - where it clearly is not.

Re:Introducing unlimited private repositories by dommer on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @07:22AM (#11674242)
I didn't say you did. Well, I don't think I did. Either way, we agree it wasn't disingenuous. I'd also agree this change won't be beneficial to all.

And GitHub is also allowing everyone to make a choice. "...you'll have at least 12 months notice before any mandated change to your plan."