News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by jeffjose on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @07:29PM (#11671506)
No linux version. I was almost convinced that this was going to be another Electron app (after slack went that route)
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by tim333 on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @08:12PM (#11671726)
I recommend Franz (http://meetfranz.com/). Does Whatsapp, works on Linux, mac, pc. Supports Slack, WeChat, HipChat, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Google Hangouts, GroupMe and Skype.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by NiekvdMaas on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @11:51PM (#11672539)
This is just a wrapper for web clients of the "protocols" they support. So WhatsApp is web.whatsapp.com in a tab, Skype is web.skype.com, etc.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by joshschreuder on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @01:01AM (#11672749)
It appears as though WhatsApp desktop is basically a wrapper on web.whatsapp.com as well.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by lucb1e on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @01:12AM (#11672771)
I assumed as much, and yet still no Linux version. I don't use WhatsApp anyway but it's still disappointing.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by magazinelala on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @12:59AM (#11672742)
Way to undermine the hard work of talented developers. Is that envy? You should see all the features its offer before calling it just a "wrapper".
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by 59nadir on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:38AM (#11673309)
I think you're reading a bit too much into his comment. It's true that the phrasing can seem dismissive, but I don't think it's meant as such to that extreme of a degree.

It being a collection of wrappers is either true or not and is not necessarily a value judgment, but a technical detail.

Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by manmal on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @01:50AM (#11672884)
It IS a wrapper around the web version. To be fair, the web version is very solid. It even warns you when your phone's battery is running low.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by jcl on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @10:05PM (#11672160)
...which, for what it's worth, is an Electron app. :)
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by tasnent on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @11:22PM (#11672449)
Eh, I'll still take it.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by chillacy on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @08:50PM (#11671887)
Wow that's cool. This seems to be the spiritual successor to Adium (maybe Pidgin, not sure if that's still active).

Edit: Tried it out. It's visually pretty but it wouldn't even let me add my Slack account (we use SSO, maybe they haven't updated for that). And then when I clicked the Send Email to Franz, the email was prepopulated with some social "download franz!" message.

Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by giancarlostoro on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @10:16PM (#11672197)
I really wish it supported Signal.

Edit:

Still pleased to use it, I don't like the Skype client for Linux.

Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by emdd on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @08:59PM (#11671919)
Thanks for the recommendation. This looks fantastic. If only it could do iMessage (which I know is a whole different beast).
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by tonybaroneee on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @12:20AM (#11672637)
Thanks, this looks amazing!
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by MaxLeiter on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @09:24PM (#11672009)
No IRC?
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by robzyb on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @08:49PM (#11671878)
Was super interested, until I realised no LINE nor KakaoChat :(
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by kawera on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @07:37PM (#11671549)
It is an Electron app from what I can see on OSX (Electron/React Native/Mantle/Squirrel). No voice calls though.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by mwcampbell on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @10:08PM (#11672170)
It is indeed an Electron app. I guess they just figured it wasn't worth the trouble to package and test it for Linux.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by wjoe on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @08:55AM (#11674789)
It takes zero effort to package Electon apps for Linux, there are plenty of tools available that will package it for all platforms with one command.

And so far, I've not seen any differences or platform specific bugs.

Sure, you'd expect a big company like WhatsApp to do QA testing on every platform they release for, but it's a shame that even with the barrier of entry is so negligibly low, that they still won't provide a Linux build. Even if it's just for the latest Ubuntu LTS that's fine, other distros can repackage it themselves.

Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by alexandrerond on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @07:42PM (#11671579)
Telegram forever ahead...
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by dmix on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @09:38PM (#11672054)
Minus the whole end-to-end encryption thing... which is still missing in their Linux gui client.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by giancarlostoro on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @10:04PM (#11672155)
There are alternate clients that support it on Linux. "Cutegram"

http://aseman.co/en/products/cutegram/

Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by devishard on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @11:01PM (#11672385)
And from all their other clients, if the industry assessments of their so-called encrypted protocol are to be believed.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by dave2000 on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @03:03AM (#11673152)
Yeah, no use to me either, althogh I did recently upgrade my windows 7 vm to windows 10 (there's no windows 7 version either). Very odd.
Re:Introducing WhatsApp's Desktop App by albeva on Wednesday May 11, 2016 @04:05AM (#11673426)
It is electron app.