Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by gfodor on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @12:07PM
(#11668218)
A slap on the wrist? It ended his career. (Any charges, etc, were a means to that end, but he resigned.)
Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by Avenger42 on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @12:24PM
(#11668356)
His public service career may have ended, but he got gigs at several private firms, as well as Harvard, Exeter, and several other universities.
I think most people believe it's unlikely Clinton will serve any time for the email lapse; instead, she's considered the front-runner for the White House.
On the other hand, Snowden had to flee the country and, like Assange, he may never be able to set foot in a country with the relevant extradition treaties.
I think the high/low court point still stands.
Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by JackFr on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @01:17PM
(#11668823)
Snowdens's purpose was to undermine the intelligence apparatus of the US, while that clearly was not Petraeus's intent.
Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by jazzyk on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @01:58PM
(#11669178)
Undermine?
You mean: Disclose that the intelligence apparatus is spying on its own citizens/taxpayers who pay their salaries?
There, fixed it for you.
Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by oarsinsync on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @12:22PM
(#11668343)
Compared to possible life in prison, possible capital punishment, possible gitmo, currently exiled in Russia, I'd say losing one's job is a comparative slap on the wrist
Not necessarily. General Petraeus purposely handed over documents to his biographer / girlfriend, and he got nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
It seems again to be a high court / low court thing. If you're important enough, your crimes get you lesser sentences, but if not, they throw the book at you.