Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by enraged_camel on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @11:31AM
(#11667918)
>>Information is born classified, markings are irrelevant. Clinton had to sign a document affirming her understanding of this in order to gain access to classified information in the first place.
Exactly. I really wish the whole "it wasn't classified at the time" argument would die already.
Re:State Dept.: Clinton IT aide's email archive is lost
by GVIrish on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @01:04PM
(#11668709)
> Information is born classified, markings are irrelevant.
Not sure what you mean by this. An enormous amount of effort is expended in government to mark classified and confidential documents properly, set their disposition dates, record who classified it and why, and so forth.
Classification is not just determined at the time of the creation of a document/artifact, it can be changed as a result of being coupled with other information, or by changes in circumstances, or simply by different readings of by different people.
Information is born classified, markings are irrelevant. Clinton had to sign a document affirming her understanding of this in order to gain access to classified information in the first place.
As for the crimes she committed, here are a few good candidates: