News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PostgreSQL Scalability: Towards Millions TPS. Parent comment

Re:PostgreSQL Scalability: Towards Millions TPS by gjolund on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @01:15AM (#11665276)
Honestly that's not something I would handle at the db layer. I would build a service that is responsible for keeping client db's in sync and abstract that away from my database entirely.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PostgreSQL Scalability: Towards Millions TPS by m_mueller on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @04:10AM (#11665818)
I'm not a fan of rolling our own sync code if I don't have to.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PostgreSQL Scalability: Towards Millions TPS by nileshtrivedi on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @05:07AM (#11665963)
RethinkDB's new project Horizon could be a solution. But of course, that's not PostgreSQL.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PostgreSQL Scalability: Towards Millions TPS by m_mueller on Tuesday May 10, 2016 @10:09PM (#11672171)
Interesting. Tbh. I'm not looking for solutions at the moment, I just know that back when we decided on the technology, CouchDB was pretty much the only good player in town. I was just curious what's out there today. RethinkDB is being mentioned a lot, I'll have to check it out some time.
[ Parent | on HN ]