Re:Posix Abstractions in Modern Operating Systems: The Old, ...
by pjmlp on Sunday May 08, 2016 @12:52PM
(#11654686)
For me POSIX always looked like the C runtime part that vendors didn't want to make part of ANSI C, thus creating a separate standard instead.
Re:Posix Abstractions in Modern Operating Systems: The Old, ...
by majewsky on Sunday May 08, 2016 @02:19PM
(#11655055)
> I think POSIX is overdue for an update.
POSIX is being updated constantly. It is just not as noticeable because POSIX is, as you say,
> an attempt to codify existing practice amongst Unix vendors, picking the best of the most widely supported features, as opposed to actually trying to come up with a good standard.
Standards probably shouldn't sit still, especially if they hew more closely towards existing practice than ideal practice. I think POSIX is overdue for an update.
As an aside though, did people ever voluntarily use csh? Aside from committed masochists, that is.