Remote code execution vulnerability in ImageMagick

Re:Remote code execution vulnerability in ImageMagick by dorfsmay on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @07:19PM (#11624997)

I wonder if the same issue exist in GraphicsMagick.

Also, I am surprised how few people have switched from ImageMagick to graphocksMagic, given that the fork happened back in 2002 and that it offers significant improvements.

http://www.graphicsmagick.org/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Remote code execution vulnerability in ImageMagick by Danack on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @08:40PM (#11625376)

"it offers significant improvements." - citation needed.

It was better for a period after the fork, but the only guy working on it hasn't maintained it that well...there's a significant number of bugs in GraphicsMagick that have been there for years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Remote code execution vulnerability in ImageMagick by Anthony-G on Wednesday May 04, 2016 @04:47PM (#11631637)

I've always chosen GraphicsMagick over ImageMagick because it has far fewer dependencies on other packages and it provides the features I want.

[ Parent | on HN ]