News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scientists say sudden oak death epidemic is no longer sto... by zamalek on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @03:12PM (#11623373)
> What it likely will do is over time dramatically change the makeup of the oak woodlands, especially along the coast and in the Sierra Nevada foothills.

Once the disease has run its course (read: all affected oaks dead), couldn't we reintroduce the extinct oaks? We've bought back a species from near-extinction already[1].

[1]: http://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2012/02/24/147367644/si...

Re:Scientists say sudden oak death epidemic is no longer sto... by whyenot on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @03:52PM (#11623661)
The problem is, it doesn't just infect oaks, but several other plant species like California bay laurel. The pathogen lives as an endophyte in the leaves of bay laurel without killing the host or even causing significant damage, yet still spreading the disease. In fact, one method to control the disease is to physically remove all the bay laurel trees from an area you would like to protect. How well this actually works is not clear to me, but I haven't kept up with the literature.
Re:Scientists say sudden oak death epidemic is no longer sto... by pixl97 on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @03:21PM (#11623455)
It is spread by spores that are very resistant. There is a possibility those spores could live in the soil for decades.
Re:Scientists say sudden oak death epidemic is no longer sto... by panglott on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @03:56PM (#11623699)
Look at the decades of effort that's gone into restoring the American chestnut, one of the most productive and economically important trees of eastern North America. This is not something that is easy to do.