Re:Google XRay: A Function Call Tracing System [pdf]
by cthalupa on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:17PM
(#11615714)
Re:Google XRay: A Function Call Tracing System [pdf]
by teraflop on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:29PM
(#11615820)
Ah, cool. I just tested it out and it seems to work as documented. Unfortunately it requires root access, and incurs about 1 microsecond of overhead per function call on my machine.
Re:Google XRay: A Function Call Tracing System [pdf]
by cthalupa on Monday May 02, 2016 @05:46PM
(#11615946)
Reading the X-Ray abstract, unless I'm missing it, it doesn't go into detail about the time overhead. I do see mention of CPU and RAM usage, though.
I'm not sure that we have any evidence that X-Ray offers less overhead here, though it's certainly cool if it does.
Re:Google XRay: A Function Call Tracing System [pdf]
by DannyBee on Monday May 02, 2016 @06:26PM
(#11616240)
Can you give an example where perf works with 10 million+ probe points?
:)
(and where this does not have an antagonist effect on the other things on the machine?)
Obviously that's not a very good approach, because you're limited to the number of breakpoints that your CPU can handle simultaneously (4 on my machine) and there's a lot of overhead. If you know of a better way to accomplish the same thing with perf, I'd be happy to hear it.