Status of F-35 – Senate Armed Services Committee Statement [pdf]

Re:Status of F-35 – Senate Armed Services Committee Statemen... by reality_hacker on Monday May 02, 2016 @01:42PM (#11613650)

> he F-35 is a 1.5 Trillion black hole; a stark lesson on the sunk cost fallacy. The F-22 exists, and works.

You compare fleet of 3k aircraft + operation costs for 80 years with fleet of 180 F-22 jets. Also F-22 can't fly from aircraft and amphibious assault ships, and do most of the ground attack missions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Status of F-35 – Senate Armed Services Committee Statemen... by 1812Overture on Monday May 02, 2016 @08:58PM (#11617056)

This aircraft is never going to be risked on a ground attack mission. It was dumb for them to think it could fill that role.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Status of F-35 – Senate Armed Services Committee Statemen... by reality_hacker on Tuesday May 03, 2016 @01:43PM (#11622730)

They can drop JDAMs, small diameter bombs from 30 miles away and turn back. You are probably saying about Close Air Support role. It can be fulfilled by high precision weapons, which can be applied from many miles distance, but also Air Force consider replacement for A-10 for this role, which will not be F-35. And some other cases of CAS can be covered by apaches and drones.

[ Parent | on HN ]