News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Can the “Who is Hiring?” post include a bit about... by delecti on Saturday April 30, 2016 @12:36AM (#11600386)
I think it's a pretty low bar to write an extra sentence or two about the interview process when they already a paragraph about how they're changing the world with their revolutionary JS framework.
Re:Ask HN: Can the “Who is Hiring?” post include a bit about... by dang on Saturday April 30, 2016 @01:44PM (#11602634)
I think that's an uncharitable way to describe the overwhelming majority of those posts. Let's get out of the habit of heaping snark on others in discussion threads. It feels amusing for a little while, but corrodes the qualities we most want here. Not a good trade.
Re:Ask HN: Can the “Who is Hiring?” post include a bit about... by delecti on Saturday April 30, 2016 @04:41PM (#11603472)
You're right, I was unfairly snarky, but quite a few jobs on every month's post try and describe themselves with overly grandiose language without really saying what they do. I just think that job posts on this site reach a fairly narrow and high quality audience (certainly more so than most job sites), and in return it's not asking too much for a grounded, concrete description of what to expect both from the company, and the interview process.

The Javascipt framework part was purely a joke, and I think was probably recognized as such by most people, though again, was probably not helpful.

Re:Ask HN: Can the “Who is Hiring?” post include a bit about... by dang on Sunday May 01, 2016 @02:25PM (#11607263)
What you say is surely true, but it's trumped by the more important concern of working together to make HN the kind of place we want it to be. That means turning ourselves into damping filters for annoyance, not amplifying ones. It doesn't mean that the inputs aren't annoying, just that when producing outputs we need to be less so.
Re:Ask HN: Can the “Who is Hiring?” post include a bit about... by MortenK on Saturday April 30, 2016 @02:16AM (#11600619)
I wanted to upvote but accidentally downvoted.