Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by wildmusings on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:41PM (#11585825)

And why shouldn't the SEC need a warrant just like the FBI does?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by cmdrfred on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:48PM (#11585848)

Because the SEC regulates publicly traded companies. If you wish to keep your email private simply don't go public.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:00PM (#11585895)

> the SEC regulates publicly traded companies

Nope. The SEC regulates all securities issued by American companies or to American investors. Tesla and SpaceX are both SEC regulated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by Retric on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:00PM (#11586127)

IMO, there is not much difference in regulating public stock and public debt. If SpaceX wants to borrow from bank of America fine, but if they want to issue trade-able bonds and borrow from John Q Public that's a separate thing.

PS: Arguably this is the same reason banks are regulated.

[ Parent | on HN ]