News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by cmdrfred on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @07:36PM (#11585489)
Ahh, that must be the real reason this was passed. Somebody doesn't like the SEC looking at their email.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by wildmusings on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:41PM (#11585825)
And why shouldn't the SEC need a warrant just like the FBI does?
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by cmdrfred on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:48PM (#11585848)
Because the SEC regulates publicly traded companies. If you wish to keep your email private simply don't go public.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:00PM (#11585895)
> the SEC regulates publicly traded companies

Nope. The SEC regulates all securities issued by American companies or to American investors. Tesla and SpaceX are both SEC regulated.

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by Retric on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:00PM (#11586127)
IMO, there is not much difference in regulating public stock and public debt. If SpaceX wants to borrow from bank of America fine, but if they want to issue trade-able bonds and borrow from John Q Public that's a separate thing.

PS: Arguably this is the same reason banks are regulated.

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by cvwright on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:31PM (#11585776)
Leave it to HN to find the cloud in every silver lining. :)

That said, perhaps you have a point...

Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by deadowl on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:15PM (#11585955)
With the ACLU and EFF backing, I'm not finding any significant negatives. On the other hand, this bill is so overdue that it leaves me wondering.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House by meddlepal on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:20PM (#11585731)
It's pathetic but I wouldn't put it past our elected officials to do this.