Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by cmdrfred on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @07:36PM
(#11585489)
Ahh, that must be the real reason this was passed. Somebody doesn't like the SEC looking at their email.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by wildmusings on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:41PM
(#11585825)
And why shouldn't the SEC need a warrant just like the FBI does?
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by cmdrfred on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:48PM
(#11585848)
Because the SEC regulates publicly traded companies. If you wish to keep your email private simply don't go public.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by JumpCrisscross on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @09:00PM
(#11585895)
> the SEC regulates publicly traded companies
Nope. The SEC regulates all securities issued by American companies or to American investors. Tesla and SpaceX are both SEC regulated.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by Retric on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @10:00PM
(#11586127)
IMO, there is not much difference in regulating public stock and public debt. If SpaceX wants to borrow from bank of America fine, but if they want to issue trade-able bonds and borrow from John Q Public that's a separate thing.
PS: Arguably this is the same reason banks are regulated.
Re:Email privacy bill unanimously passes U.S. House
by cvwright on Wednesday April 27, 2016 @08:31PM
(#11585776)
Leave it to HN to find the cloud in every silver lining. :)
That said, perhaps you have a point...