Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by eru on Sunday April 24, 2016 @08:07PM
(#11561909)
Registering with a party in the US always struck me as crazy. Can't they at least uphold the fiction that people vote on the merit of issues?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by akira2501 on Sunday April 24, 2016 @08:33PM
(#11561962)
> Can't they at least uphold the fiction that people vote on the merit of issues?
It's not a direct democracy.. other than state referendums, people generally do not have an opportunity to _actually_ vote on issues.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by boulos on Sunday April 24, 2016 @08:53PM
(#11562011)
In many (most?) primaries it's a requirement that you be a registered member of that party. Luckily for me, California doesn't subscribe to this policy.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by aiiane on Sunday April 24, 2016 @09:04PM
(#11562047)
Except for the Republican presidential primary.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by boulos on Monday April 25, 2016 @02:04AM
(#11562695)
No. For example:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/201...
(The url is the whole story).
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by WildUtah on Monday April 25, 2016 @12:10AM
(#11562485)
Many states don't have party registration. It's a convenience for parties that want to close primaries and target voters for GOTV.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by superuser2 on Sunday April 24, 2016 @11:02PM
(#11562357)
Choosing a party is pretty much how you express a position on the issues.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by eru on Monday April 25, 2016 @02:20AM
(#11562744)
In most parts of the world, only a few people are officially registered with any party. Normally, you just show up and vote what you feel like.
Re:Personal info of 93M Mexicans exposed on AWS
by Redoubts on Monday April 25, 2016 @12:18AM
(#11562501)
Do unaffiliated people have a say who gets on a party list in Europe?