News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners by vinay427 on Sunday April 24, 2016 @01:06PM (#11560410)
Many local police forces (towns, cities, universities, etc.) in the US have this type of register using the serial number but I doubt that it is centrally accessible. Instead, they usually provide a sticker with the police department name/logo that one applies on the frame to identify where it's from. This is certainly not an ideal solution; I would much rather have something like vehicle licensing but free, managed by states or the federal government, which seems more in line with what you mentioned.

Edit: Just found this supposedly national registry: https://www.nationalbikeregistry.com/

Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners by bhance on Sunday April 24, 2016 @08:41PM (#11561984)
Nobody uses the NBR .., they're basically just selling stickers. When you dig into how many LE agencies use them, it's like ... six. Maybe even less.

BikeIndex.org, though - which is mentioned in the article because that's what the batman is referencing - is totally open and has over 220+ national partners and over 70k bikes on file.

Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners by vinay427 on Monday April 25, 2016 @10:41AM (#11564460)
BikeIndex.org does seem to be especially prevalent on the west coast and definitely more widely used than the NBR, thanks for pointing that out.
Re:Seattle vigilante reuniting stolen bikes with their owners by swimfar on Sunday April 24, 2016 @06:04PM (#11561578)
But it appears that only law enforcement have access to the database. It would be much more effective if people were able use it to do a search to see if a bike was reported stolen or not. It may be because it has been around for a long time and was never updated to have an internet interface.

They say they are the "only true national database" (whatever that means), but I'm sure other (non-true) ones popped up because of this limitation.