News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Interview with Scott Aaronson by fitzwatermellow on Saturday April 23, 2016 @01:30PM (#11556465)
What constitutes a "good return" on research dollars spent? Is it mere value created? Or a breakthrough in fundamental human understanding? I'm actually quite intrigued now to mine some real data!
Re:Interview with Scott Aaronson by drumdance on Saturday April 23, 2016 @02:22PM (#11556689)
I don't know that's really measurable except over very long periods of time. A discovery may be "interesting but useless" for many decades until engineering catches up, whether through improvements in engineering technology or subsequent discoveries that make the first discovery more actionable.