Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by wwwdonohue on Friday April 22, 2016 @12:44AM
(#11547104)
There was no good case because, as the article explains in quite a lot of detail, the team was instructed not to interview anyone in any position of responsibility at Goldman/Paulson. It also explains, in quite a lot of detail again, how Goldman was not simply "assembling a security of mortgage bonds." There was quite likely intentional fraud involved.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.