News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder by mathattack on Thursday April 21, 2016 @04:46PM (#11545224)
They get very large fees for "securitizing the deal", or being the ones who turns a bunch of loans into something that can be traded. In the case of very complicated deals, it can be several percent for a transaction that is low-risk for the bank since they've already identified both sides of the trade.
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder by spinlock on Thursday April 21, 2016 @09:50PM (#11546554)
There weren't any loans being bundled in this deal. It was a synthetic.

My point is tjs Goldman is the house and made money from the deal not the outcome.