News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder. Parent comment

Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder by fcp on Thursday April 21, 2016 @03:37PM (#11544828)
Sounds very similar to this story[0][1]. If i recall correctly: Ambitious NY Fed employee claims she was fired because she wouldn't soften language in a report; secretly records meetings that show extreme deference to banks. The This American Life version is really great.

[0]https://www.propublica.org/article/carmen-segarras-secret-re...

[1]http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/536/t...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder by kelseydh on Friday April 22, 2016 @04:36AM (#11547785)
Very interesting stuff. Some of the better direct evidence for regulatory capture I have read.
[ Parent | on HN ]