Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by yolesaber on Thursday April 21, 2016 @03:12PM
(#11544612)
Except when you are a public official it is your duty to pursue these sorts of cases for the public good.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by harywilke on Thursday April 21, 2016 @03:17PM
(#11544659)
Damn your duty, I have bills to pay. Point is, why risk my job when my boss wont have my back?
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by bcook on Thursday April 21, 2016 @03:29PM
(#11544763)
This statement makes me sad... I mean, I adhere to it, but I am not exactly a person who should be emulated.
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by feverishaaron on Thursday April 21, 2016 @03:34PM
(#11544801)
It's their boss' (aka Congress) job to set a tone where it is not a livelihood risk to "do your duty".
If you're a peon, "doing your duty" is a great way to put a target on your back.
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by maxxxxx on Thursday April 21, 2016 @05:12PM
(#11545378)
100% right. Before people start looking at those guys they should look at themselves. A lot of people in corporations do things they don't agree with or find ethically questionable but since the boss says so they will do it. "The fish stinks from the head". This is not isolated to government.
Re:Why the S.E.C. didn't hit Goldman Sachs harder
by wldcordeiro on Thursday April 21, 2016 @05:30PM
(#11545485)
It's the same story everywhere. As long as there is hierarchy (which we do need in some form in most organizations) then there will be incentive for people to do things they personally disagree with due to the conflict of interest that arises.
It seems like one of the hardest problems to solve in our society because it seems to be so tied to our nature. I can recall doing things in grade school I knew was wrong but felt obligated to do because my peers and those I looked up to do too. While that isn't the same exact situation, the dynamics at play are the same. What can be done to combat this innate in-group/out-group behavior more effectively in our organizations and society?