News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by fideloper on Thursday April 21, 2016 @08:03AM (#11541367)
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by bovermyer on Thursday April 21, 2016 @11:27AM (#11542849)
This doesn't work for me, because of this issue: https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/issues/6871
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by wildpeaks on Thursday April 21, 2016 @11:43AM (#11542981)
Sadly even the most recent one still has the private_network issue (and the missing line in hosts), it just stops during vagrant up with this error:

> sudo: unable to resolve host ubuntu-xenial

> mesg: ttyname failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

I hope this PR (https://github.com/mitchellh/vagrant/pull/7241) gets merged because the private_network issue has been around since 15.04

Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by zakk on Thursday April 21, 2016 @09:53AM (#11542111)
Does it work for you? For me VirtualBox gets stuck into the 'gurumeditation' state when booting.
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by alainv on Thursday April 21, 2016 @04:05PM (#11544981)
This is a virtualbox regression because the box is packaged with the LsiLogic controller: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/15317

You can downgrade VirtualBox, dropping to 5.0.16 worked for me: http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/5.0.16/

Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by weitzj on Thursday April 21, 2016 @10:19AM (#11542291)
Same Problem. Newest VirtualBox newest vagtant 1.8.1
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by fideloper on Thursday April 21, 2016 @10:33AM (#11542422)
Also same, but have heard better reports from those on Virtuabox 4 instead of latest Virtuabox 5 :(

I had better luck with https://atlas.hashicorp.com/gbarbieru/boxes/xenial which just got updated a few hours ago.

Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by hrbrtglm on Thursday April 21, 2016 @09:54AM (#11542119)
I'm not sure as there's no description, so I'll ask. That's the desktop version, not the server one ?
Re:Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial Xerus) by fideloper on Thursday April 21, 2016 @10:34AM (#11542430)
Ummm I assumed it was the server one, perhaps I'm mistaken. Ubuntu/*64 have typically been headless.