Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by kobayashi on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @08:57PM
(#11538907)
Yah, but if you decriminalize possession it's a boon for the (still) illegal dealers and distributors. Is there any credible data to discredit my take on this?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by a3n on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @09:53PM
(#11539112)
If we have to keep putting civilians in jail so that criminals don't benefit for a brief time, I think that thought should be rethunk.
Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by kobayashi on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @10:19PM
(#11539199)
Well, as I mention in another comment [0], I'm uncertain as to whether the prospective bill will actually pass, and thus the "interim" situation could become the ongoing status quo. Additionally, such a situation would also include all the geopolitical risks I mention in that other comment, too, and could thus put the Canadian economy in peril.
I'm a supporter of legalization, but I think half-measures can lead to avoidable, unforeseen negative consequences.
Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by ktRolster on Thursday April 21, 2016 @02:01AM
(#11539980)
That is why I favor legalization over decriminalization. It looks like the Canadian PM has thought this through, though, so I don't expect problems like that.
In the article he specifically said he wants to keep criminals from profiting from sales.
Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by indlebe on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @09:11PM
(#11538963)
Do you think decriminalizing for possessing a small amount in the interim would still fuel crime?
Re:Canada to introduce legislation to legalize recreational ...
by kobayashi on Wednesday April 20, 2016 @10:22PM
(#11539211)
Well, 10 grams isn't that small (though certainly not large), and retails for about 100 CAD. So, if people become more likely to smoke up once it's decriminalized, then it would seem to me that it would provide a windfall for the sellers, distributors, and producers. I have no hard evidence to support this belief - it's just a supposition that seems to me to be reasonable and logical.