News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by partiallypro on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:25PM (#11529477)
How can you say this with a straight face when day in and day out Google and Amazon are top stories on Hacker News? Azure is the second largest cloud platform, it's pretty relevant.
[dead]
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by dang on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @07:22PM (#11531267)
It's not that odd, and you're breaking the rules by throwing around accusations of astroturfing without evidence. Please stop.

If you suspect abuse, the thing to do is email [email protected] so we can look at the data and investigate. Bringing it up in the threads will only provoke a tedious and off-topic flamewar, and if there isn't abuse going on, then you've unfairly maligned your fellow users.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by mythz on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:31PM (#11529521)
Are there any well known YC companies using Azure? All the ones I know that have published their technology stacks are using AWS, which is why I expect AWS features to be more popular on HN since they're more relevant and useful.
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by staticautomatic on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:13PM (#11529912)
I'm not a YC company but will share one man's opinion about Azure. We started using it because we have one piece of software in our stack that only runs on Windows, so we have a Windows VM and a couple Linux VM's running everything else. We're early in the life of the company so we're pretty much just using it for basics, but as a platform it's been fine. My dev ops guy seems to have few complaints on a day to day basis.

The one area we've consistently had real issues is with static IP persistence and VM location. At times, between our portal and an RDP session I've seen up to 3 different IP's for the same VM. Our VM's invariably lose their static IP's during reboots, which is a real nightmare because some of our vendors require IP white listing. We also can't seem to confirm that our servers are geographically where they're supposed to be. If we try to geolocate a server in US-West, we variously see it in other parts of the country, or even the world.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by partiallypro on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @11:50PM (#11532141)
I'm reasonably seasoned in Azure, though far, far from an expert. But it sounds like you need to set up a Reserved IP in Azure, that should solve your problem. You'll need PowerShell to do this. (tut: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/reserved-ip-addresses...)

I think you can do this from the Azure CP now, I am not 100% sure.

Your IP should not flush on reboot though, that should theoretically only occur if you're doing cold boots/shutdowns; but that's a no-no in any cloud environment unless you have a reserved IP; which is why you are encouraged to use cnames instead for domain management, etc.

As far as the region problem, this can happen if you're using something like a scale set or load balancers. That could throw off a trace route. Also making sure your storage account, etc are all in the same region is fairly important.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by partiallypro on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:33PM (#11529538)
Are you assuming that only YC company employees use Hacker News as a news source? Google gets just as much airtime as Microsoft and Amazon here, and Google is vastly smaller (as of right now) in their cloud business.
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by mythz on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:38PM (#11529569)
No I'm assuming a lot of the Startup and YC community here are overwhelming using AWS which is why I expect AWS stories would be more relevant. I just see a lot of manufactured hype around Azure and not many well-known Startups using it.
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by 3327 on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:10PM (#11529874)
I wish I had a screen shot but the post had 42 up votes and did not have a single comment. Am I the only person that finds that a bit odd?
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by moron4hire on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:43PM (#11530231)
42 is an even number.
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by dsp1234 on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @02:45PM (#11529192)
I'm a little curious. What part of Microsoft having container availability in it's cloud offering is not interesting (particularly given that it can run both linux and windows containers)?

In other words, what makes you assume that the upvotes are 'paid' vs people being interested in the technology?

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by ThinkBeat on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:13PM (#11529384)
Do you have a technical link to how to run Windows Containers in this new offering?

I tried to look and this is the most specific I could find: " At this time the service supports Linux containers only. Microsoft has committed to providing Windows Server Containers using Docker and Apache Mesos is being ported to Windows. This work will allow us to add Windows Server Container support to Azure Container Service in the future. "

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-container-servi...

However that documentation is old as you can see. I cant find any new documentation.

I did find a post on how to setup a virtual machine of Windows Server 2016 preview and use it as a container

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by rossgardler on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:34PM (#11529544)
As Corey says, Windows Server Containers are not yet supported in ACS. It is coming though.

Windows Server Containers have existed since the release of Windows Server 2016 TP4 and you can try that out on Azure if you want to experiment with early code. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowsconta...

DISCLAIMER: I work for MS as the PM on the Azure Container Service

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by CoreySanders on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:20PM (#11529441)
Right now, the Azure Container Service is a Linux only offering. We are working to enable Windows Server Container support using the Windows Server 2016 preview. Stay tuned for future announcements on this.
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by dsp1234 on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @06:26PM (#11530984)
Sorry, I was looking at this:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowsconta...

Which specifically mentions:

Windows Server Containers:

A Windows Container Host running Windows Server 2016 (Full or Core), either on-prem or in Azure.

Which I mistakenly thought was part of this offering.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by bitmapbrother on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @02:27PM (#11529040)
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by TheRealDunkirk on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @04:01PM (#11529779)
The bottom line is that any large-ish company who has a consumer-oriented product is paying for positive social media coverage. Even small ones try, as part of someone's job. The big guys just outsource it.

I expect one-third to one-half of anything positive I read about anything on the internet is bought-and-paid-for. I guess I should assume a portion of anything negative is also bought-and-paid-for by competing interests.

We invented the first, truly open and flat, egalitarian communication medium in the history of mankind, and then destroyed it within 20 years. Twenty billion web sites, and nothing exists except Amazon, Ebay, Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Good job, corporations of America. I miss the web of '94.

EDIT: Also, I have no problem whatsoever believing that Reddit is a veritable playground for companies to exercise their "reputation management." It's pretty clear that their moves in recent years were precisely to allow deep pockets to game their systems to their benefit. I think Reddit and most of their top-posters are being completely hypocritical in claiming that the system isn't stacked in favor of whoever is paying them.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by schwap on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @02:57PM (#11529268)
> Obviously, we can't confirm this story. We asked Microsoft for comment on if they have people on their payroll using Reddit.

Very compelling.

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by cwyers on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:20PM (#11529435)
Yeah. "Anonymous Redditor makes highly unsubstantiated claims that Microsoft flatly denies" is not exactly what I'd call "evidence."
Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by partiallypro on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:31PM (#11529524)
Even more questionable is that it's on Business Insider.

http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/22/henry-blodget-linkbait-slid...

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by bitmapbrother on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @03:34PM (#11529545)
It's all linked. They even run a Online Reputation service.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/online-privacy/repu...

Re:Azure Container Service is now generally available by anon987 on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @02:23PM (#11529006)
They sure are and it's much worse on Reddit.

With Microsoft's shrinking relevance to modern computing it's a given. They have billions in the bank so they might as well spend a few million on fake upvotes to give their products an illusion of popularity.

When your own former CEO calls Microsoft's current cloud numbers "bullshit", they probably are.