News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why I am betting on Julia (2014). Parent comment

Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by tanlermin on Monday April 18, 2016 @01:30PM (#11521628)
It means that I thought Julia wanted to avoid inching too much towards tracing JIT optimization.

Well, luckily dask isn't meant for MPI style parallelism. I was wondering how it compared so something like computeframework.

Good to hear that union type performance will be optimized. Are there any issues I can follow?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by tavert on Monday April 18, 2016 @04:02PM (#11522750)
A better compiler is a good thing, as long as its performance model can stay reasonably transparent.

https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8974

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why I am betting on Julia (2014) by tanlermin on Monday April 18, 2016 @04:23PM (#11522894)
Agreed.
[ Parent | on HN ]