News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by brianwawok on Monday April 18, 2016 @10:55AM (#11520372)
Did not realize the depth of this. I guess I now understand why Europeans had decent immunity to it.. it was that or die.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by encoderer on Monday April 18, 2016 @11:48AM (#11520842)
Starting in the 18th century, people began inoculating themselves in large numbers. You'd do this with pus from a victim who had a mild case of it.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by curtis on Monday April 18, 2016 @12:46PM (#11521267)
The Wikipedia article on variolation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variolation) is pretty interesting. Edward Jenner's development of Smallpox vaccination seemed much less revolutionary to me once I learned about Smallpox inoculation/variolation.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by mannykannot on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @07:23AM (#11526173)
When you dig into the history of almost anything, you find a backstory that is missing from the popular story. To me, that makes it more interesting, but I'm a nerdy want-to-kknow-how-it-really-works guy.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by Retric on Monday April 18, 2016 @10:06PM (#11524448)
Variolation was still risky with a significant risk of contracting the disease and thus death or even starting a new outbreak. So, the vaccine was still a rediculusly huge step forward.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by Retric on Monday April 18, 2016 @09:56PM (#11524418)
Variolation was still risky with a ~1% risk of death and a significant chance of starting a new outbreak. So, the vaccine was still a rediculusly huge step forward.
Re:The Black Death: The Greatest Catastrophe (2005) by brianwawok on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @01:03PM (#11528378)
So basically Variolation was MySpace, and Vaccination was Facebook?

Took an existing idea, cranked it up a notch, and sold it to the masses?