News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brutalist Websites by FussyZeus on Sunday April 17, 2016 @11:53PM (#11517621)
You can make something that doesn't require tons of frameworks and loads fast while NOT looking like a relic of the days of Kazaa. The fact that so many developers are too lazy to do so does not mean we should throw the baby out with the bathwater and go back to times new roman black-on-white.
Re:Brutalist Websites by ethanbond on Monday April 18, 2016 @01:56PM (#11521837)
As a "developer" of one aforementioned Times black on white sites, I think some people are trying to do this to push the whole spectrum a certain direction.

If you go on designernews you'll see small portfolio sites that require a motherfucking loading screen.

I made my little site (albeit not very portfolio oriented) because I could convey what I wanted to in that way, and I hope to encourage others to reassess what they're actually conveying and what they need to do so effectively. Usually not a loading screen.

Re:Brutalist Websites by FussyZeus on Tuesday April 19, 2016 @01:53AM (#11525125)
I get the utilitarian site viewpoint, but I think there's a certain minimal level of design you can put in that requires very little code, and nothing beyond garden variety CSS. IMHO if you don't go to at least that point it's pure laziness and has nothing to do with what you're trying to convey, but I fully expect other people to disagree about that.
Re:Brutalist Websites by ben_jones on Sunday April 17, 2016 @11:56PM (#11517634)
Lazy but also inexperienced. What percentage of developers can set up a site behind Nginx? What percentage behind varnish and Nginx etc. etc.

(I know Nginx can cache things, this is just an example)