News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jeremy Guillory's Counter-Complaint against Cruise Automa... by rayiner on Friday April 15, 2016 @09:38AM (#11504156)
Maybe. Guillory doesn't need to show he was issued shares to win. If Cruise promised him 50% equity, and didn't issue him any shares, that would be a breach of contract. Guillory would get damages not because he actually owned equity in Cruise, but to compensate him for the equity that was promised to him but never issued as shares. Contract damages put you in the place you would have been had the other side kept their promises.
Re:Jeremy Guillory's Counter-Complaint against Cruise Automa... by bewatson on Friday April 15, 2016 @11:19AM (#11505003)
On top of what @theoracle110 said, would other contracts in previous investment rounds (in which Jeremy did not speak up) have any power/relevance?
Re:Jeremy Guillory's Counter-Complaint against Cruise Automa... by theoracle101 on Friday April 15, 2016 @10:16AM (#11504448)
Isn't there a statue of limitations for this? It's been over 2 years and he never lodged a complaint