Re:The Linux Scheduler: A Decade of Wasted Cores [pdf]
by doe88 on Friday April 15, 2016 @06:43AM
(#11503335)
I do not follow Kernel Dev enough to have a good representation of what happened, but it seems to me that it was another example of smart people pushed out. Nowadays I think he is just maintaining his patches from one kernel release to the next, it was smart for Con to stop interacting with them and move to other types of devs, it comes a point where you have to keep your sanity.
Re:The Linux Scheduler: A Decade of Wasted Cores [pdf]
by LoSboccacc on Friday April 15, 2016 @04:31AM
(#11502951)
I remember the whole debacle back then when the lkml was summarized on that website I can't remember
It'd be interesting to see if that branch exhibit the same behavior and issues.
Re:The Linux Scheduler: A Decade of Wasted Cores [pdf]
by tremon on Friday April 15, 2016 @06:03AM
(#11503202)
Maybe KernelTrap? I was sad when it shut down, it was a very useful resource for following Linux development from the sidelines.
Re:The Linux Scheduler: A Decade of Wasted Cores [pdf]
by LoSboccacc on Friday April 15, 2016 @12:38PM
(#11505637)
Yeah that one! The memories.
Re:The Linux Scheduler: A Decade of Wasted Cores [pdf]
by DCoder on Friday April 15, 2016 @06:31AM
(#11503294)
You might be thinking of LWN. They covered the scheduler multiple times over the years: https://lwn.net/Kernel/Index/#Scheduler
I only mention this as a historical case that has remained in my memory. Maybe Linus is willing to revisit the issue, I don't follow LKML.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Con_Kolivas
[2] http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2015/12/bfs-467-linux-43-ck3.htm...