News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by brianwawok on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @01:23PM (#11490195)
So crashes like that include drunk drivers, drugged drivers, and texting drivers.

What is the crashes per miles for a paying attention driver? If it is 1 per million miles, the self driving car would need to be a lot lower. Now if it was 4am and I am falling asleep at the wheel, I bet any self driving car would beat me. So cool to turn on, but maybe not for a daytime cruise...

Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by austinsharp on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:04PM (#11490632)
It's not just crashes per mile - it's the severity of the crashes that needs to be considered too. 5 fender benders is a better outcome than 1 horrific wreck that kills someone.
Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by duaneb on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @01:58PM (#11490560)
Is crashes/mile the best metric or mistakes/mile that could lead to a crash? I certainly make a TON of mistakes that I can correct before they lead to problems--most of them are mild, like having to break a half second later than I'd like, but i bet you are UNDERestimating the improvement due to self driving cars.
Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by username223 on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:46PM (#11491034)
It's definitely crashes per mile. Unexpected stuff happens all the time on real roads -- black ice, debris, animals, flat tires -- and safety depends upon the driver's or software's ability to deal with them. It's easy for self-driving not to wander into another lane because they're changing the radio, but it's hard for them to deal with situations their designers didn't anticipate.
Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by bcook on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @01:35PM (#11490318)
Why are you comparing self-driving cars to exclusively a "paying attention driver"?

For self-driving cars to be safer than human drivers, there is no requirement that the self-driving cars should be better/safer than the best human driver... the self-driving car simply needs to be safer than the majority of humans.

Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by brianwawok on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @02:06PM (#11490662)
> For self-driving cars to be safer than human drivers, there is no requirement that the self-driving cars should be better/safer than the best human driver... the self-driving car simply needs to be safer than the majority of humans.

That is true on a whole, but not true for ME. It needs to be safer than ME, not some hypotehtical average person.

Further compounding it:

> For driving skills, 93% of the U.S. sample and 69% of the Swedish sample put themselves in the top 50% [0]

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_superiority

Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by lfowles on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @04:40PM (#11492011)
Consider that most driving is done feet away from another vehicle. If those cars start being replaced by self-driving cars, then the you are safer (system safety x personal safety). The car might make more dubious decisions than you would yourself, but now it has less opportunities for failure due to others driving erratically.
Re:Post-Mortem for Google Compute Engine’s Global Outage on ... by dagss on Wednesday April 13, 2016 @04:41PM (#11492020)
Somebody can crash into you.