News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WebUSB API: draft spec to safely expose USB device servic... by donatj on Sunday April 10, 2016 @10:49AM (#11466332)
> At least browsers generally have a better permission model than desktop apps

The flaw with that is desktop apps have the ultimate permission model, you choose to have them, and don't just stumble across them.

Re:WebUSB API: draft spec to safely expose USB device servic... by nsgi on Sunday April 10, 2016 @12:56PM (#11467012)
How are users supposed to know whether they can trust a desktop app with near-unlimited access to their computer? Generally they don't, but blindly install it anyway because it seems to do something they need.
Re:WebUSB API: draft spec to safely expose USB device servic... by erikpukinskis on Sunday April 10, 2016 @07:13PM (#11468657)
Yes, that's called "opt in" and it's the same security model this standard is proposing.
Re:WebUSB API: draft spec to safely expose USB device servic... by cm3 on Sunday April 10, 2016 @12:48PM (#11466964)
And your local apps don't self-modify the code all the time, whereas that's exactly what the dynamic browser environment with 3rd-party scripting is.