News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MathML is a failed web standard by elcapitan on Thursday April 07, 2016 @04:23AM (#11445623)
> A side benefit would mean that every browser, and every system, in the world would have TeX installed!

Is to run that giant heap of probably not sandboxed or security-audited code in every client actually a thing I would want to have? I mean people are paranoid about js doing unwanted things, but a large distribution of tex code running inside the browser, really?

Re:MathML is a failed web standard by pjc50 on Thursday April 07, 2016 @07:37AM (#11446428)
TeX's bug bounty and the credentials of its author are good reasons why it's probably one of the most reliable pieces of such code that you might have.
Re:MathML is a failed web standard by nailer on Thursday April 07, 2016 @09:15AM (#11446954)
Knuth has an older and more narrow concept of 'bug' than the current common definition.
Re:MathML is a failed web standard by elcapitan on Thursday April 07, 2016 @09:20AM (#11446978)
A "bug" in relation to the functionality of a layout software is also vastly different from battle-hardened code in the field of security.
Re:MathML is a failed web standard by IshKebab on Thursday April 07, 2016 @05:23AM (#11445914)
You can already render LaTeX equations with javascript. It would be madness to include everything but a safe subset of commands that are commonly used to render maths would be fine.